| |
What
method, what system, does an architect use to design a building?
How are programmatic needs and context – with their degrees
of freedom and constraints – translated into architectural
design?
Regardless
of their complexity, the tasks and decisions involved can be formalized
as an algorithm. As such, algorithms provide a framework for articulating
and defining both input data and procedures. This formalization
can promote structure and coherency, while systemically maintaining
full traceability of all input data.
In
recent years, algorithms in architecture have been able to transcend
their role as frameworks of formalization and abstraction. This
has been made possible in a large part by the integration of scripting
languages into CAD programs.
|
|
|
Algorithms’
output can now be directly visualized, enabling their use as a generative
design tool. Since algorithms provide the benefits of scalability
and permutability, multiple variations of a scheme are easily generated.
A slight tweaking of inputs or process leads to an instant adaptation
of output.
The
question arises to what extent the codification of a process through
an algorithm has the ability to influence and alter the process
itself. Can the structure, grammar, and logic of the language used
to depict the algorithm have a relevance per se to the design, and
can elements of this logic be embedded into the architecture? Can
the language itself provide a basis for architecture?
This
booklet presents an overview of five approaches using algorithms
in architecture. |
|